- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 11:30:26 -0000
- To: <tom@coastin.com>, <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <mark.little@arjuna.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
Tom > WSDL: operation names appear in the child of the soap body. i realise you're bringing your knowledge of the WS-I Basic Profile[1] to the table, but this behaviour isn't mandated in WSDL 2.0. Trying to constrain people to using the Global Element Declaration (GED) for dispatching proved to be devisive: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Jul/0376.html > It seems broken to me to have to rely on something outside the > soap body to dispatch the operation. my reading of the BP encourages the use of HTTP SOAPAction. Paul
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 11:29:53 UTC