Re: NEW ISSUE: Replace QName's with anyURI

+1, I was thinking of raising the very same issue.

Marc.

On Nov 23, 2004, at 1:06 PM, Rich Salz wrote:

>
> Description: There are several places where we use QName's for 
> attribute values (e.g., RelatesTo/@RelationshipType) and for content 
> (e.g., ServiceName).  Should we replace those with URI's?
>
> Justification:  Everyone else is doing it. :)  The TAG finding can be 
> interpreted as encouraging it.
>
> Target: all specs
>
> Proposal: Convert or consider providing rationale.
>
> 	/r$
>
> -- 
> Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
> DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
> XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
> XML Security Overview  http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
>
>
---
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.

Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 18:21:51 UTC