W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

Re: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:14:14 +0600
Message-ID: <09f001c4c480$3f4aa110$1f7e3009@LANKABOOK>
To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

"Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com> writes:
> Yeah, but does it have to go in the message?
> Perhaps a ReplyTo needs all the EPR's, but it seems to me that the
> sender-side runtime does *not* need to enumerate all addresses in the
> message it's creating.  Does it?

No, not at all .. I think Steve is arguing that that needs to be
there in the EPR structure. Whether that gets serialized into
the message itself as the <To> EPR (logically speaking) is a
different question. I would agree with you that you don't need
those when sending an actual message to an actual endpoint -
where you have already selected one protocol etc..

Received on Sunday, 7 November 2004 04:14:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:28:21 UTC