- From: Vinoski, Stephen <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 16:50:14 -0500
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Bergersen, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Bergersen@iona.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Cc: "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
- Message-ID: <13AC4E67178F4D4EA31BB1BA645303132DBD13@amereast-ems2.boston.amer.iona.com>
Gudge, take a look at your own business card. Does it have your address, work phone number, fax number, mobile number, email address, instant message ID, and your home page all listed on it, or do you actually have multiple business cards, one listing your address, a separate one listing your work phone, another listing your email address, etc.? You seem to imply that an endpoint is accessible via only a single transport and protocol. Where I come from, endpoints can be accessed over any number of transports and protocols. Why limit an EPR to describing only a single path to an endpoint? There is much middleware prior art in exsitence that proves that such a limit is completely unnecessary. --steve -----Original Message----- From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:35 PM To: Bergersen, Rebecca; public-ws-addressing@w3.org Cc: Newcomer, Eric; Vinoski, Stephen Subject: RE: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR I take issue with the assertion "where there are different protocols/transports/formats available for the same service, the "access to a Web service endpoint" requires the client to choose among alternatives". If I, the service, give you, the client, a single EPR then as far as you are concerned, there is only one mechansim with which you can communicate with me. So you don't need to make any choices ( except whether to communicate or not, I guess ). If I am available on multiple EPRs, then I'll provide you with multiple EPRs (perhaps in a WSDL document), *then* you have to choose one from the set. Gudge _____ From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bergersen, Rebecca Sent: 04 November 2004 11:53 To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Cc: Newcomer, Eric; Vinoski, Stephen; Bergersen, Rebecca Subject: WS-A Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR According to the ws-addressing submission, "Endpoint references convey the information needed to identify/reference a Web service endpoint, and may be used in several different ways: endpoint references are suitable for conveying the information needed to access a Web service endpoint...." However, in the situation where there are different protocols/transports/formats available for the same service, the "access to a Web service endpoint" requires the client to choose among alternatives, each accessible in the standard manner through a port - but there are different ports for each protocol/transport/format alternative. When such alternatives exist, the EPR must be able to identify those multiple ports. Rebecca Bergersen Principal Architect, Middleware Standards <mailto:rebecca.bergersen@iona.com> rebecca.bergersen@iona.com ------------------------------------------------------- IONA Technologies 200 West Street Waltham, MA 02451 USA Tel: (781) 902-8265 Fax: (781) 902-8001 ------------------------------------------------------- Making Software Work Together TM
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 21:50:40 UTC