- From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 14:17:26 -0800
- To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>, "Francisco Curbera" <curbera@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
Having Mandatory verbs outside of bodies has proven utility and scalability, like the Web. The whole point of SOAP is to allow extensibility that is not achieved with HTTP and is protocol independent. Decentralized addition of verbs is a good thing, and SOAP gives us headers to do exactly that. Are you implicitly saying that you don't want decentralized verb creation, ie protocol specific verbs? Or that you always want the decentralized verbs always inside the message? I can't tell if I'm having a decentralized verb creation bad argument or a verbs in headers bad argument. Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Webber [mailto:Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk] > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 2:03 PM > To: David Orchard; Mark Little; Francisco Curbera > Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > Subject: RE: Mandator wsa:Action (was Re: WS-Addr issues) > > > I don't want to live in the message bodies always contain the > > verb world any more. > > I don't want to live in the verb for the message body can be found in > this header over here world either :-) > > wsa:action is inherently a verb (an action). > > Jim > -- > http://jim.webber.name
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 22:17:48 UTC