- From: Savas Parastatidis <Savas.Parastatidis@newcastle.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2004 01:06:48 -0000
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Hey Dave,
[snip[
>WSAddressing, through the mandated use of
> wsa:Action, has opened the door for that to change. Newer specs,
> like WS-MDEX, have embraced wsa:Action's "I'm the operation"
definition
> to the point where if there are no parameters they don't even see the
need
> to put anything in the env:Body. wsa:Action is no longer just an
> extension
> element but rather can be "the payload".
To further add to Dave's above comment...
Due to the combination of wsa:action and reference properties we see
SOAP messages that look more and more like this...
<soap:Envelope>
<soap:Header>
<wsa:Action>blabla:SendEmailNotification</wsa:Action>
<appl:CustomerFirstName>Savas</appl:CustomerFirstName>
<appl:CustomerLastName>Parastatidis</appl:CustomerLastName>
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body />
</soap:Envelope>
Effectively moving the application-specific payload to the header
section of the soap envelope not leaving anything for the receiving
application specific actor.
Regards,
.savas.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2004 01:06:59 UTC