- From: Brinild <brinild@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 18:02:28 -0800 (PST)
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
--- Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com> wrote: >...And I don't think MEP semantics > should be inferred from the presence/absence of wsa: > headers ( although > the set of such headers could be infered, or even > explicitly stated, for > a given MEP ). Too bad. The idea of having a self-describing soap envelope has its appeal. Also, knowing if its a request/ response MEP by looking at the message can eliminate some ambiguity; for example in cases where there are two port-types with the same operation, one as a request/response and one as a one-way. ===== Brinild@yahoo.com http://brinild.blogspot.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. www.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 02:03:01 UTC