- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 08:48:32 -0500 (EST)
- To: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
- cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> +1 for a normative schema .. however that's not impossible while
> supporting XML 1.1; that's what WSDL 2.0 is going to be doing.
FWIW, I think WSDL 2.0 is horrible; I'll have a column on
webservices.xml.com in a day or two that explains it in more detail.
I think that if this WG wants to address XML1.1 -- perhaps someone should
open a new issue on that exact point -- then it should be in a separate
small section at the end of the document. Personally, I see absolutely
nothing wrong with saying something like this:
XSD does not yet support XML 1.1. XML 1.1 is not fully
backward-compatible with XML1.0, nor is it generally
available or deployed. Given this, whenever we find ourselves
having to choose between support, or clean and simple use
of XML1.0/XSD over XML1.1, we chose the former. Section X.Y
defines a normative mapping of this specification to XML 1.1.
Then we only need someone to volunteer to write the mapping.
/r$
--
Rich Salz Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Saturday, 13 November 2004 13:48:35 UTC