- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 17:32:38 -0500
- To: "Bergersen, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Bergersen@iona.com>
- Cc: "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, "Newcomer, Eric" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>
This is now issue i026: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i026 On Nov 4, 2004, at 11:53 AM, Bergersen, Rebecca wrote: > Issue 28 - Multiple ports needed in an EPR > > According to the ws-addressing submission, "Endpoint references convey > the information needed to identify/reference a Web service endpoint, > and may be used in several different ways: endpoint references are > suitable for conveying the information needed to access a Web service > endpoint...." However, in the situation where there are different > protocols/transports/formats available for the same service, the > "access to a Web service endpoint" requires the client to choose among > alternatives, each accessible in the standard manner through a port - > but there are different ports for each protocol/transport/format > alternative. When such alternatives exist, the EPR must be able > to identify those multiple ports. > > Rebecca Bergersen > Principal Architect, Middleware Standards > rebecca.bergersen@iona.com > ------------------------------------------------------- > IONA Technologies > 200 West Street Waltham, MA 02451 USA > Tel: (781) 902-8265 > Fax: (781) 902-8001 > ------------------------------------------------------- > Making Software Work Together TM > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 22:32:44 UTC