- From: Bob Freund <Bob.Freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 07:39:40 -0500
- To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3587D6FDF44881459313970A8DE75A8101B68D92@exchange.quadrasis.com>
Statement of issue: At the moment there is no specification of the lifetime of an Endpoint Reference. What needs to be decided is: 1) Is there a need to provide a mechanism for management of EPR lifetime? If yes then what should it do? 2) Or: Is there a need to make some statement concerning an implied EPR lifetime? If yes then what? Arguments Against: 1) The web has gone well enough up to now with the tacit assumption that uri's live forever. 2) There is nothing like a 404 to indicate that the EPR you seek has gone missing. The service thus has complete control over expiration. 3) Much complexity especially in request-response MEPs. A lot of this complexity will arise from treatment of the case of EPRs expiring between receipt of request and receipt of response. This complexity will extend to further complicate all protocols that permit the use of EPR expiration. Arguments in Favor: 1) Provides a handy way for the EPR minter to control cache contents. General Puzzlements: 1) Would EPRs compare equal if their expiration times were not equal? 2) If one received a message with an expired EPR in its to:, whan ought it to be dropped? 3) If one received an expired EPR in its replyto: ought the message be discarded?
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 12:40:14 UTC