- From: Srinivas, Davanum M <Davanum.Srinivas@ca.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:25:39 -0500
- To: "Christopher B Ferris" <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>
So technically this is a viable solution ("we don't lose the ability to leverage the SOAP processing model") right? If yes, I will write up some scenario for using it (intermediary/management/proxy type of scenario) Thanks, dims -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher B Ferris Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 5:54 PM To: Srinivas, Davanum M Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org Subject: RE: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's I'm still unclear as to why you think it necessary. If an endpoint publishes an EPR with ref props and/or params, one assumes that it is doing so full in the knowledge as to what it intends to do with these as SOAP headers. The one thing that distinguishes them in the context of an EPR is that ref props are used in determinging EPR equivalence (e.g. that the two equivalent EPRs have the same metadata (WSDL, schema, policy, etc.) The intent of defining EPR equivalence is specifically so that the sending node can know which policies it can expect will be applied (or which to apply). Cheers, Christopher Ferris STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: http://webpages.charter.net/chrisfer/blog.html phone: +1 508 377 9295 public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 11/24/2004 05:21:17 PM: > Is this a hot potato? :) no replies so far :) > > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of > Srinivas, Davanum M > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 12:56 PM > To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: Using attributes to mark RefProp's and RefParam's > Team, > Me and Igor were chatting about how to mark RefProp's and RefParam's > on the way back AND still not > "lose the ability to leverage the SOAP processing model", here's the outcome?..Comments? > Suppose we have an EPR which says this: > <wsa:EndpointReference> > <wsa:Address> > http://www.example.com/services/someService > </wsa:Address> > <wsa:ReferenceProperties> > <tns:resourceID>DataChunk42</tns:resourceID> > </wsa:ReferenceProperties> > <wsa:ReferenceParameters> > <tns:expires>32000</tns:expires> > </wsa:ReferenceParameters> > </wsa:EndpointReference> > Can we have it come back as this? > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope> > <SOAP-ENV:Header> > <wsa:MessageID>msgid:1234567902282223</wsa:MessageID> > <wsa:To>http://www.example.com/services/someService</wsa:To> > <wsa:Action>http://www.example.com/someAction</wsa:Action> > > <wsa:From>http://www.example.com/clients/someClient</wsa:From> > <wsa:ReplyTo><wsa:Address>http://www.example.com/clients/someOtherClient </wsa: > Address></wsa:ReplyTo> > <wsa:FaultTo><wsa:Address>http://www.example.com/clients/yetAnotherClien t</wsa: > Address></wsa:FaultTo> > <tns:resourceID wsa:type="property">DataChunk42</tns:resourceID> > <tns:expires wsa:type="parameter">32000</tns:expires> > </SOAP-ENV:Header> > <SOAP-ENV:Body> > ... > </SOAP-ENV:Body> > </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> > Davanum Srinivas > Computer Associates > Senior Architect, Web Services Group > Tel: +1 508 628 8251 > davanum.srinivas@ca.com > http://ws.apache.org/~dims/ > Davanum Srinivas > Computer Associates > Senior Architect, Web Services Group > Tel: +1 508 628 8251 > davanum.srinivas@ca.com > http://ws.apache.org/~dims/
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 23:25:41 UTC