- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 16:34:01 -0000
- To: <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
[big snip] > I think that if you expect a reply, you MUST specify [reply > endpoint]. So in request-response style MEPs [reply endpoint] would > always be specified in the request message. sorry to butt-in, and sorry if i'm stating the obvious (as usual), i'm aware that i should tred very carefully before sticking my oar between two XMLP veterens on this subject. i think this issue has at it's core how dependent messages are upon the underlying layers. AIUI, Gudge is coming at this problem from the POV of the transport independence of SOAP messages, whereas i believe Marc is thinking about the exchange of messages over transports such as HTTP, SMTP, MQSeries, etc all of which can provide a return path for messages, no? so i wondered if it might be helpful to first look at issue i007, since that could well help here, in particular if we are able to define the order of precedence between values such as ReplyTo and action obtained from: - message body processing, - ws-addressing headers - other SOAP processing - the underlying transport Paul
Received on Friday, 12 November 2004 16:33:25 UTC