public-html@w3.org from March 2009 by date

Tuesday, 31 March 2009

• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Jonas Sicking
• RE: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Travis Leithead
• RE: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Travis Leithead
• Re: SVG in text/html Steve Schafer
• Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors Henri Sivonen
• Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors Lachlan Hunt
• HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors Henri Sivonen
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Henri Sivonen
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Henri Sivonen
• Input on the agenda Ian Hickson
• Re: Naming of <header> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Naming of <header> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Roy T. Fielding
• Re: SVG in text/html Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG in text/html Cameron McCormack
• Re: SVG in text/html Cameron McCormack
• Re: SVG in text/html Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG in text/html Cameron McCormack
• Re: SVG in text/html Cameron McCormack

Monday, 30 March 2009

• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG in text/html Doug Schepers
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Sam Ruby
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: SVG in text/html Anne van Kesteren
• RE: editing the IRI spec Dan Connolly
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Sam Ruby
• Re: SVG in text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• [Fwd: Discussion of abarth-origin] Sam Ruby
• Re: SVG in text/html Sam Ruby
• typos Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: SVG in text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: SVG in text/html Dana Lee Ling

Sunday, 29 March 2009

• RE: editing the IRI spec Ian Hickson
• [Bug 6746] New: case-insensitivity of other than a-z and A-Z, e.g., diacritics bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• RE: editing the IRI spec Larry Masinter

Saturday, 28 March 2009

• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Sam Ruby
• Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog Julian Reschke
• Re: Naming of <header> jgraham@opera.com
• Re: Naming of <header> Steven Faulkner
• Re: Naming of <header> Philip Taylor
• Re: Naming of <header> Steven Faulkner
• Re: Naming of <header> Philip Taylor
• Re: Naming of <header> Steven Faulkner
• Re: Naming of <header> Anne van Kesteren
• Re: SVG in text/html Jonas Sicking

Friday, 27 March 2009

• Re: Naming of <header> Steven Faulkner
• Re: Revamp HTML5 doctype sniffing? Ian Hickson
• Re: Naming of <header> Ian Hickson
• Revamp HTML5 doctype sniffing? Daniel Schattenkirchner
• Re: Naming of <header> James Graham
• Re: Naming of <header> James Graham
• Re: Naming of <header> James Graham
• Re: SVG in text/html Robin Berjon
• Re: SVG in text/html Robin Berjon
• Re: Naming of <header> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: SVG in text/html Robin Berjon
• Re: Naming of <header> Joshue O Connor
• Naming of <header> James Graham
• [Bug 6743] New: AAA still reads from the DOM bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: SVG in text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: SVG in text/html Andreas Neumann
• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req Michael(tm) Smith
• [Bug 6742] New: pre-encoded form values should be restorable as submitted bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req Rob Sayre
• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: SVG in text/html Jonas Sicking

Thursday, 26 March 2009

• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req Rob Sayre
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Jonas Sicking
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: SVG in text/html T.V Raman
• Re: SVG in text/html Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG in text/html Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• Re: no HTML WG telcon 2009-03-19 Chris Wilson
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: SVG in text/html Erik Dahlström
• Re: SVG in text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: <video> feedback Simon Pieters
• [Fwd: Re: SVG in text/html] Sam Ruby
• Re: SVG in text/html Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: SVG in text/html Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG in text/html G. Wade Johnson
• Re: SVG in text/html Doug Schepers
• Re: <video> feedback Robert O'Callahan
• Re: SVG in text/html Doug Schepers

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

• <video> feedback Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG in text/html Sam Ruby
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: SVG in text/html Jeff Schiller
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Simon Pieters
• Re: Input on the agenda Sam Ruby
• Re: Input on the agenda Jeff Schiller
• Re: Input on the agenda Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Input on the agenda Jeff Schiller
• Re: Element Whitelisting Rob Sayre
• Re: Element Whitelisting James Graham
• Re: Element Whitelisting Rob Sayre
• Re: SVG in text/html Henri Sivonen
• Re: ARIA status (Was: Input on the agenda) Steven Faulkner
• Re: Element Whitelisting Doug Schepers
• ARIA status (Was: Input on the agenda) Ian Hickson
• Re: Input on the agenda Sam Ruby
• Re: Input on the agenda Sam Ruby
• Re: Element Whitelisting Sam Ruby
• Re: SVG in text/html Doug Schepers
• SVG in text/html Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 24 March 2009

• [Bug 6736] New: dfn.js doesn't handle class="impl" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Element Whitelisting Erik Dahlstrom
• RE: localStorage and IE8 Adrian Bateman
• Re: Element Whitelisting Henri Sivonen
• Re: Element Whitelisting James Graham
• Re: Element Whitelisting Doug Schepers
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Element Whitelisting Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Erik Dahlström
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Element Whitelisting James Graham
• Re: Content model for SVG <title> Doug Schepers
• Re: Element Whitelisting Henri Sivonen
• Re: Content model for SVG <title> (was: Re: Input on the agenda) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) Karl Dubost
• Re: Element Whitelisting Erik Dahlström
• [Bug 6729] New: Attribute getters/setters should lower case argument on HTML elements in HTML docs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Element Whitelisting Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) Rob Sayre
• Re: Element Whitelisting Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) Rob Sayre
• Re: Element Whitelisting Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) Doug Schepers
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Cameron McCormack
• Re: Element Whitelisting Doug Schepers
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (was: Input on the agenda) Ian Hickson
• SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (was: Input on the agenda) Doug Schepers
• Input on the agenda Ian Hickson
• Content model for SVG <title> (was: Re: Input on the agenda) Cameron McCormack
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking

Monday, 23 March 2009

• localStorage and IE8 Ian Hickson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Boris Zbarsky
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Ian Hickson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Julian Reschke
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Boris Zbarsky
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Henry S. Thompson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Load event and <video> Simon Pieters
• Rendering section issues John-Mark Bell
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Julian Reschke
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Julian Reschke
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Joshue O Connor
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Joshue O Connor
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Henri Sivonen
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Jonas Sicking
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot - WATS.ca
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 22 March 2009

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Karl Dubost
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Andi Sidwell
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Philip & Le Khanh

Saturday, 21 March 2009

• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages Ian Hickson
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events Michael A. Puls II
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot

Friday, 20 March 2009

• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events Ian Hickson
• Re: HTMLSelectElement.add() Ian Hickson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly
• Re: Load event and <video> Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Load event and <video> Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Load event and <video> Jonas Sicking
• Re: Load event and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Load event and <video> Charles McCathieNevile
• Sizing of <video poster=svg> Simon Pieters
• Re: Load event and <video> Jonas Sicking
• Re: Load event and <video> Simon Pieters

Thursday, 19 March 2009

• Re: Load event and <video> Chris Pearce

Friday, 20 March 2009

• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Load event and <video> Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Load event and <video> Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Load event and <video> Robert O'Callahan

Thursday, 19 March 2009

• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Jonas Sicking
• Re: Times, dates, and related topics Kornel Lesiński
• Load event and <video> Simon Pieters
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> James Graham
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Jon Gunderson
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Sam Ruby
• Flushing trailing text in document.write() Henri Sivonen
• Re: View Source G. Wade Johnson
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] Times, dates, and related topics Lachlan Hunt
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Thomas Roessler
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Thomas Roessler
• Re: View Source Robin Berjon
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Alasdair King
• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Robin Berjon
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Henri Sivonen
• Re: Splitting out sections from HTML5 Jonas Sicking
• Times, dates, and related topics Ian Hickson
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Alasdair King

Thursday, 19 March 2009

• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: View Source Rick
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Doug Schepers
• Re: View Source David Woolley

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Jonas Sicking
• Re: View Source Jeff Schiller
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Cameron McCormack
• Re: storage event Anne van Kesteren
• Re: storage event Cameron McCormack
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Jonas Sicking
• Re: View Source Robin Berjon
• Re: View Source G. Wade Johnson
• Re: storage event Jonas Sicking
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style Doug Schepers
• no HTML WG telcon 2009-03-19 Chris Wilson
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: storage event Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (was: Input on the agenda) Robin Berjon
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli
• Splitting out sections from HTML5 Ian Hickson
• CDATA, Script, and Style (was: Input on the agenda) Doug Schepers
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Jonas Sicking
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Ian Hickson
• Re: View Source Rick
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Marco Neumann
• storage event Anne van Kesteren
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs Julian Reschke
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Julian Reschke
• XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs Anne van Kesteren
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Marco Neumann
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Julian Reschke
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Marco Neumann
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Julian Reschke
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Anne van Kesteren
• uagent a11y tools (Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas>) David Bolter
• "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) Dan Connolly
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> Jon Gunderson
• Re: View Source Anne van Kesteren
• Re: View Source G. Wade Johnson
• Re: View Source Robin Berjon
• Re: Input on the agenda Robin Berjon
• Re: View Source Jeff Schiller
• Re: View Source Robin Berjon
• Re: Input on the agenda G. Wade Johnson
• Re: View Source G. Wade Johnson
• Re: Input on the agenda Philip Taylor
• Re: Input on the agenda Simon Pieters
• Re: View Source Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: Input on the agenda Robin Berjon
• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

• Re: View Source Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 18 March 2009

• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Re: View Source David Woolley
• Author view of the spec Ian Hickson
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 17 March 2009

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> richarduserite
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal T.V Raman
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Rick
• Re: View Source Jeff Schiller
• Re: View Source Lachlan Hunt
• 'loadeddate' inconsistency Eric Carlson
• Re: View Source Boris Zbarsky
• Re: View Source Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: View Source Boris Zbarsky
• RE: View Source Dailey, David P.
• Re: View Source Jeff Schiller
• Re: View Source Michael A. Puls II
• Re: View Source Lachlan Hunt
• Re: View Source Lachlan Hunt
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Robin Berjon
• Re: View Source Robin Berjon
• Re: View Source Karl Dubost
• Re: View Source James Graham
• Re: View Source Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: View Source Karl Dubost
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• Re: View Source Henri Sivonen
• Re: View Source Philip TAYLOR
• Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: View Source Steve Axthelm
• Re: View Source Philip TAYLOR
• RE: View Source Justin James
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• RE: View Source Justin James
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Karl Dubost
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) L. David Baron
• Re: View Source Doug Schepers
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Rick
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: View Source Rob Sayre
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Jeff Schiller
• View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Doug Schepers
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking

Monday, 16 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• RE: [whatwg] <time> Kristof Zelechovski
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Smylers
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Jim O'Donnell
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Input on the agenda Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal T.V Raman
• RE: [whatwg] <time> Kristof Zelechovski
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal David Woolley
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Robin Berjon
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Robin Berjon

Sunday, 15 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> Aryeh Gregor
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (apparantly o) Tom Duhamel
• Fwd: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Smylers
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns

Saturday, 14 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel
• RE: [whatwg] <time> WeBMartians
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Smylers
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal David Woolley
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal David Woolley
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Smylers
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Jonas Sicking
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns

Friday, 13 March 2009

• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) L. David Baron
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Jonas Sicking
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Carlisle
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Mikko Rantalainen
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Carlisle
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• RE: [whatwg] <time> Kristof Zelechovski
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Julian Reschke
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Robert J Burns
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Boris Zbarsky
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns

Thursday, 12 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• RE: [whatwg] <time> Dailey, David P.
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• RE: [whatwg] <time> Kristof Zelechovski
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Julian Reschke
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Geoffrey Sneddon
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• [Bug 6690] New: Document.renameNode() is not part of Web DOM bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [Bug 6689] New: Element.setAttributeNode() shouldn't modify the attribute node bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> Tom Duhamel

Thursday, 12 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> Bruce Lawson
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Jim O'Donnell
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Erik Dahlström
• Re: Making it possible to use an <svg> root in text/html Simon Pieters
• an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) Leif Halvard Silli

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal G. Wade Johnson

Thursday, 12 March 2009

• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 11 March 2009

• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 Henri Sivonen
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 Sam Ruby
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jeff Schiller
• EOF in start tag Simon Pieters
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Robin Berjon
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Robin Berjon
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Robin Berjon
• RE: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Richard Ishida
• Re: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Robin Berjon
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Robin Berjon
• [Bug 6684] New: Disregard of RFC 4329 and IANA MIME Media Types bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Ben Boyle
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: Accessibility in HTML 5? Joshue O Connor
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Anne van Kesteren
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Images in <video> and stretching/preserving ratio Simon Pieters
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Simon Pieters
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Jim O'Donnell
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• RE: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Dailey, David P.
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Jonas Sicking
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Ian Hickson
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Rob Sayre
• Re: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Ian Hickson
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Jonas Sicking
• SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Doug Schepers
• Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Doug Schepers
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Charles McCathieNevile
• SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) Doug Schepers
• RE: [whatwg] <time> -- looking forward toward HTML6, needs assessment and spec-splintering Dailey, David P.

Tuesday, 10 March 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Ian Hickson
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Cameron McCormack
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Andy Mabbett
• SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal Doug Schepers
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Jim O'Donnell
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Aryeh Gregor
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Robert J Burns
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML Doug Schepers
• RE: Script in SVG vs. HTML Dailey, David P.
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML Jeff Schiller
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [whatwg] <time> David Singer
• Re: Input on the agenda Sam Ruby
• RE: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Dailey, David P.
• Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) Doug Schepers
• Images in <video> and stretching/preserving ratio Simon Pieters
• Re: Input on the agenda Robin Berjon
• error events for unsupported <source>s Simon Pieters
• Re: Input on the agenda Henri Sivonen
• Re: Input on the agenda Simon Pieters
• Re: [whatwg] <time> Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Input on the agenda Doug Schepers
• Re: Input on the agenda Sam Ruby
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking

Monday, 9 March 2009

• Re: Input on the agenda Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Input on the agenda Jonas Sicking
• Re: Input on the agenda Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Input on the agenda Doug Schepers
• [Bug 6670] New: Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Input on the agenda Ian Hickson
• Re: [Bug 6669] New: Rendering: s/disabled/enabled/ for noscript Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)
• [Bug 6669] New: Rendering: s/disabled/enabled/ for noscript bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Input on the agenda Doug Schepers
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Simon Pieters
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Simon Pieters
• Input on the agenda Ian Hickson

Sunday, 8 March 2009

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Philippe Le Hegaret

Saturday, 7 March 2009

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) T.V Raman
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Sam Ruby
• [Bug 6662] New: Make clearer that "the script's encoding" doesn't refer to the encoding of the script file itself bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) ddailey
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Karl Dubost
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Ian Jacobs
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) David Singer
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Eduardo Gutentag

Friday, 6 March 2009

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) T.V Raman
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Eduardo Gutentag
• RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Chris Wilson
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) T.V Raman
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel John Kemp
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
• [Bug 6659] New: textarea also needs text-indent:initial bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 5 March 2009

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Sam Ruby
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Dailey, David P.
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Ian Hickson
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• [Bug 6656] New: make clear that Referer headers track the pushState()d URL bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Maciej Stachowiak
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Dailey, David P.
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Philippe Le Hegaret
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Chris Wilson
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Smylers
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Dailey, David P.
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Steven Pemberton
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Steven Pemberton
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Lachlan Hunt
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Lee Kowalkowski
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Alexey Feldgendler
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Philip TAYLOR
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates Philip TAYLOR
• [html-author] Recent Updates Lachlan Hunt
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• [Bug 6652] New: spellcheck should allow empty string bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) L. David Baron
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Ian Hickson
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida

Wednesday, 4 March 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) Philippe Le Hegaret
• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme Michael A. Puls II
• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme Boris Zbarsky
• [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme Andrew Fedoniouk
• HTML WG telcon 2009-03-05 *cancelled* Sam Ruby

Tuesday, 3 March 2009

• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Julian Reschke
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 2 March 2009

• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Matt Morgan-May
• Re: Summary attribute: attention and focus Robert J Burns
• Re: Flagging layout tables Henri Sivonen
• Re: Flagging layout tables Olivier GENDRIN
• Re: Summary attribute: attention and focus David Poehlman
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Jonas Sicking
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Flagging layout tables Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Smylers
• Summary attribute: attention and focus Sam Ruby
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli

Sunday, 1 March 2009

• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition William Loughborough
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 Steve Axthelm
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Smylers
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition David Poehlman
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Philip Taylor
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Smylers
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition David Poehlman
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition David Poehlman
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Michael Hausenblas
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Steven Faulkner
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Smylers
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition David Poehlman
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Steven Faulkner
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Philip TAYLOR
• [canvas] Using HTMLVideoElement with createPattern() Simon Pieters
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Ian Hickson
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Leif Halvard Silli
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition Gez Lemon
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:09:54 UTC