- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:35:57 +0100
- To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:06:16 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote: > At the moment, DanC is focusing on a task that he feels that he can > handle, namely the definition of a new concept that is layered on top of > the IRI specification. AFAICT what DanC is doing is what Hixie was doing which is to make a new layer on top of the URI specification effectively obsoleting the need for the IRI specification. (The IRI specification was still used in the definition of what constitutes a valid URL though, but that only affects processing of conformance checkers.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2009 12:36:51 UTC