- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:17:19 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I don't follow. (E.g. I've no idea what you mean by stating that URLs
> are URLs.)
The URL parameter to be used in XHR could be defined as an URL as
defined in RFC 3986.
> We want to support the following scenarios
>
> client.open("GET", "x x")
> client.open("GET", "ë")
Who is "we"? I think I don't.
> as the majority of clients today handle them. As far as I know that
> requires HTML5 URL handling. That Internet Explorer does not handle the
The first one requires "HTML5" handling, and I'm not convinced it's a
good idea to allow it.
The second one simply requires RFC3987 handling.
> second case currently is no reason not to make it work going forward,
> especially since everyone else already does support it.
Are you referring to XHR 1 or XHR 2?
Speaking of which, what's the state of XHR 1?
BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 15:18:05 UTC