- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:34:56 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Mar 5, 2009, at 03:03, Ben Adida wrote: > I've delved into multiple specs, given technical > examples, and even written code to prove that Henri's assumptions were > incorrect. The code you have shown[1] uses a namespace-unaware API (DOM Level 1). Using a namespace-unaware API isn't a suitable way to show the absence of issues with namespace-aware APIs. > I've spent an untold number of hours debating this issue when Henri > isn't even interested in *using* RDFa. I am, however, interested in the requirements posed on text/html parsers and I'm interested in the impact RDFa support would have on validators. > Personal taste is, in particular, *not* a good reason to change > anything. I continue to disapprove of downplaying technical issues by portraying them as personal taste. [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/impl/js/ -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 07:35:42 UTC