- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:51:20 +0000
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anne van Kesteren writes:
> Those bullet points are defining what is "valid". I thought LEIRIs are
> not supposed to be used?
They are precisely intended to be used, in that by saying that
e.g. "The value of [the xml:base] attribute is interpreted as a Legacy
Extended IRI (LEIRI) as defined in the W3C Note "Legacy extended IRIs
for XML resource identification" [1] the XML Base spec. expects people
to be guided by the LEIRI spec. when they write
<foo xml:base="...
Or do I misunderstand your question?
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#syntax
- --
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJx+g4kjnJixAXWBoRAkGiAJ4nTrK5oQMaXSKD5LwmMS3+PYl9rQCbBwMm
lEdVasAKwRd84IMaQ2vDiAc=
=jqQ5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 19:52:20 UTC