- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:25:40 -0800
- To: Eduardo.Gutentag@Sun.COM
- Cc: raman@google.com, jonas@sicking.cc, ian@hixie.ch, plh@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, site-policy@w3.org
Eduardo, You clearly missed the smiley at the end of the assertion"you're in MIT". The primary purport of the message wasn't to say W3C should use the MIT license, rather, it was to say we shouldn't be causing license proliferation by creating yet another new license. It is critical for many of the Open Source projects building on W3C Specs to have a license that is compatible with the underlying codebase --- and I believe an exercise to create a license that matches those needs will ultimately culminate in a license that is as much the same as one of the existing Apache or BSD style licenses. -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ Google: tv+raman GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Received on Friday, 6 March 2009 23:26:29 UTC