- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:39:28 +0100
- To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Smylers 2009-03-16 22.03: > Tom Duhamel writes: > Hi Tom. I'd like you to clarify an aspect of your proposal: > >> <time>2009-03-16</time> >> Printing directly on the page, no tool tip: "March 16, 2009" W3C Internationalization allready have a FAQ comment regarding the behaviour that Tom proposes here [1]: "Some have advocated the creation of a <date> tag that would display dates according the locale of the user agent. This is subject to the same practical issues as described for dynamic date generation with the Japanese example. The appropriate format is generally a function of the linguistic context of a page, rather than the user's platform." The "Japanese example" (which discusses using HTTP accept-language negotiation): "* A Japanese person reading the generated date 03/04/02 in an English document might mistakenly assume that this used an English ordering. * Displaying a generated date in a Japanese date format such as 2003年4月2日 in an English page would probably look out of place." Thus, in a way, such a proposal works against the advice to insert dates using ISO. I don't think we want it. (It looks funnily enough when e.g. an English Web site suddenly displays parts of the pages in Norwegian only because content negotations works "too well". [1] http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-date-format#bytheway -- leif halvard silli
Received on Monday, 16 March 2009 23:40:09 UTC