- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:34:55 +0100
- To: "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>, "Dana Lee Ling" <dleeling@comfsm.fm>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
-www-archive +public-html (see http://www.w3.org/mid/624EEBFD-02CD-4782-8E87-42D963119D23@iki.fi ) On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:43:56 +0100, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote: > There a some ad agency-created "high impact" marketing sites created in > Flash. These tend to put text views inside a vector graphics enclosure. FWIW, I think they also tend to <embed> the Flash in a text/html page. > To create similar sites with Open Web technologies, one might want to > have an <svg> root and then HTML content in a <foreignObject>. [...] > Having an SVG root has different behavior wrt. sizing the content to the > view port. But it's easy enough to get the same visual result with an <html> root: <!DOCTYPE html> <title>...</title> <style> html { height:100% } body { height:100%; margin:0 } svg { display:block; width:100%; height:100% } </style> <svg ... So this use case doesn't seem too compelling for making <svg> as root in text/html. Another use case might be to allow text/html syntax for SVG images that are referenced from HTML <img> or CSS 'content'. Such images tend to be static, however, so probably don't suffer so much from XML's fragileness. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 07:36:22 UTC