- From: Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:08:50 -0400
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, public-html@w3.org
Le 23 mars 2009 à 14:14, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : >> acceptable for the people who serve and read XML+XSLT. > > Which is, in the grand scheme of things, pretty much no one. MAMA says ;) (though brian didn't look specifically this) On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:03:03 GMT In MAMA: XML - Opera Developer Community At http://dev.opera.com/articles/view/mama-xml/ Conversely, some interesting XML-related technologies had very low representation in the URLs that MAMA analyzed; XLINK was detected 152 times, but XML events, XHTML2, XFORMS and XSLT each only had 1-2 dozen cases each. Server-side XSLT (a separate implementation vector than this evidence of client-side XSLT) likely has higher usage rates than MAMA's XSLT numbers indicate—evidence from the "Server" and "X-Powered-By" HTTP header fields support this -- Karl Dubost Montréal, QC, Canada http://twitter.com/karlpro
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 19:09:12 UTC