- From: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:26:19 +0000
- To: Steve Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>
- CC: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
Steve Axthelm wrote: > That was my initial reaction as well. After thinking about it some more, > I don't really have strong feelings one way or the other. One way or > another (browser extensions, scripting, etc.) it'll be easy to get the > raw source so I don't see any harm, and agree there are potential > benefits in making the cleaned-up serialization the default shown to > authors. I could live with that only if it were not described as "view source"; source is source, and to pretend that a serialised DOM (worse, a serialised DOM after error recovery has taken place) is disingenuous, misleading, and arguably dishonest. Philip TAYLOR
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 07:27:12 UTC