- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 08:36:43 -0800
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Julian Reschke wrote: > The transformation *result* is RDF data. It doesn't tell you how to > interpret parts of the source. No, sorry, I believe that's *exactly* what it tells you. When you're writing HTML with GRDDL (or with eRDF, which has the same indirection property), you're saying "this is how to interpret my value of @rel." Put another way: if you're willing to mistakenly interpret rel="foobar" the same way in two documents that have different GRDDL transformations (same GRDDL profile), then you can misinterpret the RDFa, too. Fine by me. What's the difference? -Ben
Received on Sunday, 1 March 2009 16:37:26 UTC