- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:41:30 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 15:29 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:56:59 +0100, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > Attached find a draft for ACTION-68 > > "try factoring URI/URL stuff out as a separate draft" > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/68 > > > > > > (for my reference: it's rev 45:ff09a2b4d3ac ) > > I just have a small editorial comment for now. It would be nice if the > document was agnostic of HTML5. E.g. XMLHttpRequest requires identical > handling of URLs and I am pretty sure CSS does too. That makes sense... I think the connections to HTML 5 are mostly there to make it easy on reviewers who are familiar with the URL material in the HTML 5 draft; I don't think there's any lasting need for them. Any suggestions for the title? maybe something like: "Web Addresses: markup conventions for URIs and IRIs" > (And very likely every > specification that deals with them and user agents implement, but I have > not tested that exhaustively.) > > > Having just noticed appendix B "The algorithm below allows square brackets > in the <host> field; the algorithm in section 2 above does not." is that > what user agents do too? (Not really sure how to test that...) Good question; it's something I'm still looking into; bonus points to anybody who can contribute data. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 14:41:55 UTC