- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:51:26 -0500
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: "Dailey, David P." <david.dailey@sru.edu>, Karl Dubost <karl+w3c@la-grange.net>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, site-policy@w3.org
Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:03 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: >> Dailey, David P. wrote: >>> I am not sure if Philippe's intention was to have this discussion here at public-html as well >> I'm not certain what plh's intentions were, but given that we were asked >> to provide use cases as a group, I would like to gather together a >> response as a group. I am planning on attending the AC meeting later >> this month, and would like to be able to represent the working group's >> position on this matter. > > Having the response from the HTML Working Group prior to the AC meeting > is going to be useful indeed, and discussion on public-html is perfectly > appropriate. site-policy isn't a public list so it can't be used for > useful discussion. W3C, as a SDO, isn't used to the concept of allowing > a fork. On the other hand, the HTML community, which nowadays contains a > significant chunk of open source individuals, is perfectly used to that > concept. I see the current discussion as a good preparation for the one > we'll have at the upcoming AC meeting. Culture is important. The following captures a good bit of mine: http://markmail.org/message/ss7b54yuhrruysij > Philippe - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2009 19:52:10 UTC