public-html@w3.org from March 2009 by author

Adrian Bateman

• RE: localStorage and IE8 (Tuesday, 24 March)

Alasdair King

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Wednesday, 18 March)

Alexey Feldgendler

• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)

Andi Sidwell

• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Sunday, 22 March)

Andreas Neumann

• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme (Wednesday, 4 March)
• [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme (Wednesday, 4 March)

Andy Mabbett

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• typos (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Content model for SVG <title> (was: Re: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: storage event (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: storage event (Wednesday, 18 March)
• storage event (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs (Wednesday, 18 March)
• XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)

Aryeh Gregor

• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)

Ben Adida

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Ben Boyle

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)

Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme (Wednesday, 4 March)

Bruce Lawson

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 6746] New: case-insensitivity of other than a-z and A-Z, e.g., diacritics (Sunday, 29 March)
• [Bug 6743] New: AAA still reads from the DOM (Friday, 27 March)
• [Bug 6742] New: pre-encoded form values should be restorable as submitted (Friday, 27 March)
• [Bug 6736] New: dfn.js doesn't handle class="impl" (Tuesday, 24 March)
• [Bug 6729] New: Attribute getters/setters should lower case argument on HTML elements in HTML docs (Tuesday, 24 March)
• [Bug 6690] New: Document.renameNode() is not part of Web DOM (Thursday, 12 March)
• [Bug 6689] New: Element.setAttributeNode() shouldn't modify the attribute node (Thursday, 12 March)
• [Bug 6684] New: Disregard of RFC 4329 and IANA MIME Media Types (Wednesday, 11 March)
• [Bug 6670] New: Allow unescaped &s, at least in attributes that accept URLs (Monday, 9 March)
• [Bug 6669] New: Rendering: s/disabled/enabled/ for noscript (Monday, 9 March)
• [Bug 6662] New: Make clearer that "the script's encoding" doesn't refer to the encoding of the script file itself (Saturday, 7 March)
• [Bug 6659] New: textarea also needs text-indent:initial (Friday, 6 March)
• [Bug 6656] New: make clear that Referer headers track the pushState()d URL (Thursday, 5 March)
• [Bug 6652] New: spellcheck should allow empty string (Thursday, 5 March)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Content model for SVG <title> (was: Re: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: storage event (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 10 March)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)

Chris Pearce

• Re: Load event and <video> (Thursday, 19 March)

Chris Wilson

• Re: no HTML WG telcon 2009-03-19 (Thursday, 26 March)
• no HTML WG telcon 2009-03-19 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• RE: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• RE: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: [whatwg] <time> -- looking forward toward HTML6, needs assessment and spec-splintering (Wednesday, 11 March)
• RE: Script in SVG vs. HTML (Tuesday, 10 March)
• RE: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 10 March)
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• RE: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)

Dan Brickley

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Dan Connolly

• RE: editing the IRI spec (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Dana Lee Ling

• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)

Daniel Schattenkirchner

• Revamp HTML5 doctype sniffing? (Friday, 27 March)

David Bolter

• uagent a11y tools (Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas>) (Wednesday, 18 March)

David Carlisle

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)

David Poehlman

• Re: Summary attribute: attention and focus (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

David Singer

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)

David Woolley

• Re: View Source (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Saturday, 14 March)

ddailey

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)

Doug Schepers

• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Content model for SVG <title> (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Wednesday, 18 March)
• CDATA, Script, and Style (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)

Dr. Olaf Hoffmann

• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)

Eduardo Gutentag

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)

Eric Carlson

• 'loadeddate' inconsistency (Tuesday, 17 March)

Erik Dahlstrom

• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)

Erik Dahlström

• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Thursday, 12 March)

G. Wade Johnson

• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: View Source (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)

Gez Lemon

• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors (Tuesday, 31 March)
• HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Flushing trailing text in document.write() (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Flagging layout tables (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 2 March)
• Flagging layout tables (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Henry S. Thompson

• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)

Ian Hickson

• Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Black-box equivalence of parsing fragments directly into context node (Monday, 30 March)
• RE: editing the IRI spec (Sunday, 29 March)
• Re: Revamp HTML5 doctype sniffing? (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• <video> feedback (Wednesday, 25 March)
• ARIA status (Was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 24 March)
• localStorage and IE8 (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: [WF2] new attributes that often conflict with actual pages (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: HTMLSelectElement.add() (Friday, 20 March)
• Times, dates, and related topics (Thursday, 19 March)
• Splitting out sections from HTML5 (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Author view of the spec (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Input on the agenda (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)

James Graham

• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (Tuesday, 10 March)

jgraham@opera.com

• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)

Jim O'Donnell

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)

John Foliot

• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Saturday, 21 March)
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Tuesday, 17 March)

John Foliot - WATS.ca

• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Saturday, 21 March)
• Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Tuesday, 17 March)

John Kemp

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

John-Mark Bell

• Rendering section issues (Monday, 23 March)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Thursday, 19 March)
• RE: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Wednesday, 18 March)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Splitting out sections from HTML5 (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: storage event (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 (Monday, 2 March)

Joshue O Connor

• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Accessibility in HTML 5? (Wednesday, 11 March)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: XMLHttpRequest and HTML5 URLs (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 3 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Justin James

• RE: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• RE: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)

Karl Dubost

• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Kornel Lesiński

• Re: Times, dates, and related topics (Thursday, 19 March)

Kristof Zelechovski

• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)

L. David Baron

• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: HTML 4.01 Strict table attributes and downplayed errors (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Times, dates, and related topics (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Registering the about: URI scheme (Tuesday, 3 March)

Larry Masinter

• RE: editing the IRI spec (Sunday, 29 March)

Lee Kowalkowski

• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Naming of <header> (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Monday, 23 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Sunday, 22 March)
• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Manu Sporny

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)

Marco Neumann

• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Wednesday, 18 March)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Matt Morgan-May

• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Monday, 2 March)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: [forms] Detailed review of the DOMControlValueChanged and 'input' events (Saturday, 21 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [html5] self-sufficient documents and data URI scheme (Wednesday, 4 March)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req (Friday, 27 March)

Mikko Rantalainen

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: Flagging layout tables (Monday, 2 March)

Patrick H. Lauke

• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)

Philip & Le Khanh

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Sunday, 22 March)

Philip Taylor

• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: [Bug 6669] New: Rendering: s/disabled/enabled/ for noscript (Monday, 9 March)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Sunday, 8 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Wednesday, 4 March)

Richard Ishida

• RE: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)

richarduserite

• Re: Thoughts towards an accessible <canvas> (Tuesday, 17 March)

Rick

• Re: View Source (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)

Rob Sayre

• Re: ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req (Friday, 27 March)
• ISSUE-64: web-sockets-scope-req (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: SVG Revision of HTML5 Proposal (ACTION-117) (Tuesday, 24 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Robert J Burns

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] Fwd: <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Friday, 13 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Summary attribute: attention and focus (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Robert O'Callahan

• Re: <video> feedback (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)

Robin Berjon

• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: View Source (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG as Root (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: SVG <title> (was: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Tuesday, 31 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Thursday, 19 March)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• [Fwd: Discussion of abarth-origin] (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Monday, 30 March)
• Re: Shrinking HTML5 some more — Anne’s Weblog (Saturday, 28 March)
• [Fwd: Re: SVG in text/html] (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG in text/html (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Element Whitelisting (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Thursday, 19 March)
• {agenda} HTML WG telcon 2009-03-12 (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• HTML WG telcon 2009-03-05 *cancelled* (Wednesday, 4 March)
• Summary attribute: attention and focus (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)

Simon Pieters

• Re: <video> feedback (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: CDATA, Script, and Style (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Monday, 23 March)
• Sizing of <video poster=svg> (Friday, 20 March)
• Re: Load event and <video> (Friday, 20 March)
• Load event and <video> (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Wednesday, 18 March)
• Re: Making it possible to use an <svg> root in text/html (Thursday, 12 March)
• EOF in start tag (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Images in <video> and stretching/preserving ratio (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Re: Script in SVG vs. HTML (was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 11 March)
• Images in <video> and stretching/preserving ratio (Tuesday, 10 March)
• error events for unsupported <source>s (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: Input on the agenda (Tuesday, 10 March)
• Re: [html-author] Recent Updates (Monday, 9 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 9 March)
• [canvas] Using HTMLVideoElement with createPattern() (Sunday, 1 March)

Smylers

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Monday, 2 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Steve Axthelm

• Re: View Source (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: summary="" in HTML5 ISSUE-32 (Sunday, 1 March)

Steve Schafer

• Re: SVG in text/html (Tuesday, 31 March)

Steven Faulkner

• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Saturday, 28 March)
• Re: Naming of <header> (Friday, 27 March)
• Re: ARIA status (Was: Input on the agenda) (Wednesday, 25 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)
• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Thursday, 5 March)

T.V Raman

• Re: SVG in text/html (Thursday, 26 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: SVG Feedback on HTML5 SVG Proposal (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Saturday, 7 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)
• Re: Draft W3C Excerpt License (Re: WG Decision - spec license use cases) (Friday, 6 March)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Thursday, 12 March)

Thomas Roessler

• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Thursday, 19 March)
• Re: "Web addresses in HTML 5" for review (ISSUE-56 urls-webarch) (Thursday, 19 March)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 6 March)

Tom Duhamel

• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Tuesday, 17 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Monday, 16 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (apparantly o) (Sunday, 15 March)
• Fwd: [whatwg] <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Sunday, 15 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)
• Re: [whatwg] <time> (Wednesday, 11 March)

Travis Leithead

• RE: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Tuesday, 31 March)
• RE: an interoperable object (fallback and context menus) (Tuesday, 31 March)

WeBMartians

• RE: [whatwg] <time> (Saturday, 14 March)

William Loughborough

• Re: Draft text for summary attribute definition (Sunday, 1 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 22:09:54 UTC