W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2009

Re: View Source

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:13:28 +0000
Message-ID: <49C0AD28.8010804@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: www-svg@w3.org
CC: public-html@w3.org
Philip TAYLOR wrote:

> No, I am certainly opposed : when I say "view source", that
> is exactly what I mean; if there were an option "view
> DOM serialisation", I could envisage uses for it, but
> the two are as different as chalk and cheese.

Whilst I think there is a need for both modes, there is a long historic 
precedent for view source not showing the true source, e.g. Netscape 
showed the output from load time document.write's, not the original source.

David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 08:14:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:43 UTC