- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:44:42 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:56:59 +0100, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: >> Attached find a draft for ACTION-68 >> "try factoring URI/URL stuff out as a separate draft" >> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/68 >> >> >> (for my reference: it's rev 45:ff09a2b4d3ac ) > > I just have a small editorial comment for now. It would be nice if the > document was agnostic of HTML5. E.g. XMLHttpRequest requires identical > handling of URLs and I am pretty sure CSS does too. (And very likely > every specification that deals with them and user agents implement, but > I have not tested that exhaustively.) Are you sure XMLHttpRequest needs the same handling? I recall testing with (non-URI) IRIs some time ago, and they were simply not supported. > ... BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 18 March 2009 14:45:31 UTC