- From: Steve Axthelm <steveax@pobox.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:47:21 -0700
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, public-html@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
On 2009-03-16 Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> wrote: >No, I am certainly opposed : when I say "view source", that >is exactly what I mean; if there were an option "view >DOM serialisation", I could envisage uses for it, but >the two are as different as chalk and cheese. That was my initial reaction as well. After thinking about it some more, I don't really have strong feelings one way or the other. One way or another (browser extensions, scripting, etc.) it'll be easy to get the raw source so I don't see any harm, and agree there are potential benefits in making the cleaned-up serialization the default shown to authors. Regards, -Steve -- Steve Axthelm steveax@pobox.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 March 2009 06:48:14 UTC