public-html@w3.org from July 2008 by author

Adam Barth

• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

Al Gilman

• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 24 July)
• linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Wednesday, 23 July)

Alexey Proskuryakov

• Re: Unsupported transport-layer encodings (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Charset usage data (Tuesday, 22 July)

Alfonso Martínez de Lizarrondo

• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Sunday, 6 July)

Andrew Fedoniouk

• Re: Workers (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Workers (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Workers (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Workers (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Workers (Thursday, 10 July)

Andrew Sidwell

• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Monday, 14 July)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: example with source code (Monday, 14 July)
• Web sockets: typo (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: the "HTML URL" issue (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Ben 'Cerbera' Millard

• Re: example with source code (Wednesday, 16 July)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: SVG is not MathML (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 5909] New: Need a solution for replaceable properties (Tuesday, 29 July)
• [Bug 5899] New: Allow uppercase "CHARSET=" in legacy encoding decl (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 5898] New: Don't convert attributes to lowercase for localName/nodeName (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 5897] New: Make &ohm; and &angst; expand to their NFC equivalents (Friday, 25 July)
• [Bug 5895] New: Require attributes on <embed> and data-* attributes to be lowercase (Thursday, 24 July)
• [Bug 5883] New: data: URLs (Monday, 21 July)
• [Bug 5881] New: Make tokeniser data states headers visible in table of contents (Friday, 18 July)
• [Bug 5866] New: SVG in HTML (Monday, 14 July)
• [Bug 5863] New: Tokeniser: "Bogus comment" state unclear (Sunday, 13 July)
• [Bug 5859] New: Spec doesn't handle unknown schemes (Saturday, 12 July)
• [Bug 5858] New: Case marked as fragment when it can occur at other times (Friday, 11 July)
• [Bug 5856] New: height/width DOM attributes in combination with display:none (Friday, 11 July)
• [Bug 5852] New: Incorporate Entity Reference Table into Authoring Guide (Thursday, 10 July)
• [Bug 5851] New: Consider adding .toArray() on NodeList and HTMLCollection (Thursday, 10 July)
• [Bug 5850] New: JS global object (Thursday, 10 July)
• [Bug 5848] New: Write the "fetching" section (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 5846] New: Accessing Object Parameters from an Embedded SVG (Wednesday, 9 July)
• [Bug 5839] New: Work on Worker Threads (Monday, 7 July)
• [Bug 5837] New: Rename CDATA block state to CDATA section state (Sunday, 6 July)
• [Bug 5836] New: Syntax section allows <ins><p></ins> (Sunday, 6 July)
• [Bug 5835] New: no apparent mechanism for applying a caption to a fieldset (Saturday, 5 July)
• [Bug 5834] New: provide normative advice on area element text alternative (Friday, 4 July)
• [Bug 5833] New: Work on ClientInformation (Friday, 4 July)
• [Bug 5831] New: mark up constructors in IDL (Thursday, 3 July)
• [Bug 5830] New: Work on video (Thursday, 3 July)

Cameron McCormack

• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 10 July)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal is also ISSUE-37 (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Cross-posting etiquette (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: Error handling for SVG and MathML in HTML (Wednesday, 9 July)

Chris Wilson

• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Thursday, 24 July)
• RE: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Wednesday, 23 July)
• RE: Request for PFWG WAI review of @summary for tabular data (Wednesday, 23 July)
• ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Wednesday, 23 July)
• RE: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Wednesday, 23 July)
• RE: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)
• On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 17 July)
• RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)

Christian Schmidt

• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)

Collin Jackson

• Re: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas (Thursday, 3 July)

Dailey, David P.

• RE: example with source code -- several responses (Wednesday, 16 July)
• RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)
• example with source code (Monday, 14 July)

Dan Connolly

• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 31 July)
• FYI: Firefox 3.1 Will Support Ogg (ISSUE-7 video-codecs) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 17 July)
• any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] (Monday, 7 July)

Daniel Glazman

• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)

Daniel Stenberg

• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Dave Singer

• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Dean Edridge

• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)

Doug Schepers

• Re: SVG is not MathML (Thursday, 31 July)
• SVG is not MathML (was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37)) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)

Eric Lawrence

• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Sunday, 6 July)

Erik Dahlström

• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)
• SVG in HTML proposal (Monday, 14 July)

Frank Palinkas

• Re: example with source code (Wednesday, 16 July)

Garrett Smith

• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 10 July)

Geoffrey Sneddon

• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Henrik Nordstrom

• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

HTML Issue Tracking Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-57 (Joshue): @headers [HTML 5 spec] (Thursday, 17 July)

Ian Hickson

• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: The header element's textual content (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Image intrinsic aspect ratio and replaced element box aspect ratio (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Downloading of images by UA (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: HTMLImageElement.width / height (detailed review of Semantics) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Fundamental assumptions (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Fundamental assumptions (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Detailed review of 3.18.2. The datagrid element (Monday, 28 July)
• Re: <canvas> JPEG quality (Saturday, 26 July)
• Re: "The html element" (detailed review of the DOM) (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: document.body (detailed review of the DOM) (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Order of nodes from getElementsByClassName (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Case-insensitive comparison (part of my detailed review of tokenization) (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: Workers (Friday, 25 July)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: What <object> represents in different views (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: <object> content-type sniffing (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Removing the data attribute on <object> (detailed review of Semantics) (Thursday, 24 July)
• SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: [whatwg] Handling of HTTP response codes for <embed>, was: <embed> feedback (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: ***DHSPAM*** Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Workers (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• RE: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Workers (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Workers (Friday, 18 July)
• RE: Workers (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: Workers (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: example with source code (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: [imps] content type sniffing - stream length (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: [imps] content type sniffing - unknown type (Saturday, 12 July)
• Re: HTMLCollection item() vs. namedItem() with [] syntax (detailed review of the DOM) (Thursday, 10 July)
• Workers (Thursday, 10 July)
• Re: Cross-posting etiquette (Wednesday, 9 July)
• Re: ProgressEvent and unreachable networkState LOADED in HTMLMediaElement (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)

James Graham

• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

Jamie Lokier

• Re: Namespace dispatching in XHTML, XML (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Jeff Schiller

• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: ISSUE-37: RE: SVG in HTML proposal (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)

Jens Meiert

• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Monday, 28 July)

Jirka Kosek

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: ISSUE-54 (html5-doctype-vs-xslt): XSLT 1.0 can not generate HTML5 documents [HTML 5 spec] (Friday, 4 July)

John Kemp

• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Workers (Friday, 25 July)

Jonathan Rees

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 17 July)

Julian Reschke

• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• WHATWG IRC discussion about GRDDL and head/@profile (ISSUE-55) (Saturday, 26 July)
• Handling of HTTP response codes for <embed>, was: [whatwg] <embed> feedback (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Friday, 18 July)
• Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• who owns link relations, was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• notations of link relation names, was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)
• websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Wednesday, 2 July)
• Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Wednesday, 2 July)

Justin James

• RE: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Thursday, 31 July)
• RE: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: Downloading of images by UA (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• RE: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Monday, 28 July)
• RE: Workers (Tuesday, 22 July)
• RE: Workers (Tuesday, 22 July)
• RE: Workers (Monday, 21 July)
• RE: Workers (Sunday, 20 July)
• RE: Workers (Friday, 18 July)
• RE: Workers (Thursday, 10 July)
• RE: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: who owns link relations, was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: websocket HTTP response parsing (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Karl Dubost

• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

Kornel Lesinski

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)

Kristof Zelechovski

• RE: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas (Thursday, 3 July)

L. David Baron

• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Lachlan Hunt

• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Sunday, 20 July)
• [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Saturday, 19 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Lee Kowalkowski

• Re: example with source code (Tuesday, 15 July)

Leif Halvard Silli

• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: Workers (Thursday, 10 July)

Mark Baker

• Namespace dispatching in XHTML, XML (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: who owns link relations, was: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)
• Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Martin Duerst

• Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)

Michael A. Puls II

• Re: FYI: Firefox 3.1 Will Support Ogg (ISSUE-7 video-codecs) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: changes in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1 (Thursday, 31 July)
• October target for HTML5 WD with HTML forms integration (Thursday, 31 July)
• targeting August for next working draft of HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Formal survey: Web Forms Features; respond by July 10 (Friday, 4 July)

Mike Ter Louw

• Re: [whatwg] The <iframe> element and sandboxing ideas (Wednesday, 2 July)

mikko.honkala@nokia.com

• Proposal: Worker Threads and Synchronous DB API (Wednesday, 23 July)

Olivier GENDRIN

• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)

Patrick Garies

• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)

Peter Krantz

• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 17 July)

Phil Archer

• Re: Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Philip Taylor

• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (ISSUE-41, ISSUE-37) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)

Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)

• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Fundamental assumptions (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Fundamental assumptions (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Friday, 4 July)

Philip Taylor (Webmaster)

• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)

Pierre Saslawsky

• RE: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 24 July)
• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Wednesday, 23 July)

Robert J Burns

• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Liaison with CSS WG to provide a mechanism for expressing the style of document semantics (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: URI/IRI vs HTML-URL, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)

Robin Berjon

• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Tuesday, 15 July)
• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Monday, 14 July)

Roland Merrick

• Re: changes in HTML5 draft regarding XHTML1 (Thursday, 31 July)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Ryan King

• content type sniffing - stream length (Saturday, 12 July)
• content type sniffing - unknown type (Saturday, 12 July)

Sam Kuper

• Re: FYI: Firefox 3.1 Will Support Ogg (ISSUE-7 video-codecs) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: linking work on processing WAI-ARIA markup in HTML (Thursday, 24 July)

Sam Ruby

• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Deciding in public (Was: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal) (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: SVGWG SVG-in-HTML proposal (Was: ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility) (Tuesday, 29 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Monday, 7 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Sunday, 6 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Saturday, 5 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• RE: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-02 (Thursday, 3 July)

Simon Pieters

• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: Translation control in HTML5 (Thursday, 31 July)
• Re: img issue: should we restrict the URI (Wednesday, 30 July)
• Re: document.body (detailed review of the DOM) (Monday, 28 July)

Smylers

• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Tuesday, 22 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)

Stefan Eissing

• Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)
• Re: the "HTML URL" issue, was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea (Tuesday, 8 July)

T.V Raman

• Re: any error-free web pages at all? [was: Why Microsoft's authoritative=true won't work and is a bad idea] (Tuesday, 8 July)

Thomas Broyer

• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: Doctype on text/html Pages (Was: [author-guide] Character Entity References Chart) (Wednesday, 23 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Monday, 21 July)
• Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility (Thursday, 17 July)
• Re: example with source code (Wednesday, 16 July)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: SVG in HTML proposal (Thursday, 17 July)

William A. Rowe, Jr.

• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Friday, 4 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)
• Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter (Thursday, 3 July)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2008 23:56:46 UTC