Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:32:36 GMT

On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:41 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Rather than persisting FUD, I'd challenge you to point out only one
> significant site, and a relatively minor site, affected by such a change.

I encourage you to build a copy of Firefox without content sniffing
and try surfing the web.  I tried this for a while, and I remember
there being a lot of broken sites, including digg.com and united.com.

Adam