- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:46:20 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Simon Pieters wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:59:11 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > > > I think the spec should be aligned with what IE and Opera do on getting, > > i.e. return the first body or frameset element in the document. I think the > > spec is fine for setting. > > ...except the wording needs to be changed a bit. Step 3 says: > > Otherwise, if the body element is not null, then replace that element > with the new value in the DOM, as if the root element's replaceChild() > method had been called with the new value and the incumbent body element > as its two arguments respectively, then abort these steps. > > s/root element/body element's parent node/ How can the body element's parent node ever be anything but the root element, given the definitions in the spec? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 22:46:56 UTC