W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2008

Re: Workers

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:22:14 +0000 (UTC)
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0807202320010.12994@hixie.dreamhostps.com>

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
> 
> But intention is to isolate Worker from the Document and rest of the 
> DOM, correct?

No, the intention is to isolate the script running inside the worker from 
the Document object, not to isolate the actualy implementation.


> It appears as I am getting term "browsing context" wrong.
> Is it something that can be expressed in terms of formal interface definition
> like:
>    interface BrowsingCtx { ... }
> or is it some abstraction behind the scene?

A browsing context is basically a tab or window or iframe.


> I think that term 'thread' shall be used in the specification instead of 
> "completely separate and parallel execution environment".

It was suggested that using the term "thread" would imply state sharing, 
since most threading mechanisms do indeed share state. Here it's more like 
a separate process than a separate thread.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2008 23:22:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:16:19 GMT