W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2008

Re: On ISSUE-41: Decentralized extensibility

From: Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:39:02 +0100
Message-ID: <487F0526.1070404@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
To: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>


Chris Wilson wrote:

> I just realized I'd never sent my opinion about extensibility in HTML.
> 
> In short, I think extensibility is a very good idea, with some parameters around it.  Particularly as I look at the challenges of sanely incorporating vocabularies such as SVG and MathML, and then what we would need to do when the next vocabulary comes along, it would seem to be a necessity (or we're just encouraging people to roll their own).  I think it's a poor language that doesn't think about its own extensibility, particularly when its own vocabulary already approaches "prohibitively large".

Hear hear.
Philip TAYLOR
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 08:53:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:38:56 UTC