Re: Microsoft's "I mean it" content-type parameter

Sam Ruby wrote:
> http://feedvalidator.org/testcases/atom/1.1/brief-noerror.xml

> This is a testcase (you might have guessed such from the URI).  It
> has been served as application/xml for years.  Sometime during the
> that period a number of uppity browsers one by one decided to throw
> out the rules that have guided the development of the internet and
> that they knew better than I did as to how this data was intended to
> be displayed.

What's the problem with this resource?

I'm assuming that one-by-one uppity browsers includes Firefox, as
there aren't many major browser engines.  The resource seems to behave
fine in Firefox.

-- Jamie