www-tag@w3.org from November 2013 by subject

'reactive' or 'agent-driven' content negotiation query

[apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation

[Json] BOMs

[Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Json] Encoding detection

[Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gapbetween Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: removegapbetween Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

[Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft

Article on Extensible Web

BOMs

BOMs (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

CFC, app: URI scheme

Consensus re: top-level value restriction (Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML

Encoding detection

Encoding detection (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft)

es-discuss Digest, Vol 81, Issue 82

Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON

Fwd: CFC, app: URI scheme

FYI: United Nations -- The right to privacy in the digital age

JSON feedback we could submit

JSON: encodings

JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft

Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-07.txt> (The JSON Data Interchange Format) to Proposed Standard

Minutes of TAG telcon 2013-10-17

Perhap relevant -- Long Term Web Semantics

Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis?

Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation

Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG:

Web Animations Feedback?

X-HTTP-Method-Override request header

Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2013 18:57:36 UTC