- From: Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:54:29 +0000
- To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- CC: es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
On 11/13/13 2:40 PM, "Carsten Bormann" <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >On 13 Nov 2013, at 13:27, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote: > >> It would be nice if ECMA-404 was clearer on this > >I think the only way to read the English prose in ECMA-404 is to always >allow insignificant whitespace around every token, including the single >token that makes up an out-of-container JSON value. >That is also consistent with the most widely deployed extensions of JSON >for out-of-container values, including the one in recent JavaScript. > >(Yes, it is easier to be unambiguous with ABNF.) Note further that since ECMA-404 says: "The whitespace characters are: character tabulation (U+0009), line feed (U+000A), carriage return (U+000D), and space (U+0020)" that the encoding detection does not need to be modified again with this change. -- Joe Hildebrand
Received on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 21:54:57 UTC