www-tag@w3.org from November 2013 by date

Saturday, 30 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Noah Mendelsohn

Thursday, 28 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Tim Berners-Lee
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Tim Bray
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Alex Russell
• FYI: United Nations -- The right to privacy in the digital age Melvin Carvalho
• Re: [Json] Consensus on JSON-text (WAS: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Tim Bray

Wednesday, 27 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Henri Sivonen
• Re: Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams

Tuesday, 26 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML John Cowan
• Re: Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML Julian Reschke
• Re: Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Henri Sivonen
• Enabling/improving 'follow your nose' from XML Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Allen Wirfs-Brock

Monday, 25 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Martin J. Dürst

Friday, 22 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: removegapbetween Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gapbetween Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Tim Bray
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Julian Reschke
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Robin Berjon
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 21 November 2013

• Re: [Json] BOMs Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] BOMs John Cowan
• Re: [Json] BOMs Mathias Bynens
• Re: [Json] BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: [Json] BOMs Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Json] BOMs Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Json] BOMs Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON Martin J. Dürst

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

• Re: Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON Alex Russell
• Re: Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON Anne van Kesteren
• Final Proposed Text for Liaison to IETF re: JSON Appelquist Daniel (UK)
• Re: Encoding detection (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Json] BOMs Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] BOMs Pete Cordell
• Re: [Json] BOMs Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] BOMs Martin J. Dürst

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

• Re: BOMs Chris Lilley
• Re: [Json] BOMs Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Consensus re: top-level value restriction (Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Nico Williams
• Re: [Json] BOMs Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] BOMs Tatu Saloranta
• Re: [Json] BOMs Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: BOMs Martin J. Dürst
• Re: BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 18 November 2013

• Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 81, Issue 82 Mihai Niță
• Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 81, Issue 82 Mihai Niță

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

• Re: BOMs Martin J. Dürst

Monday, 18 November 2013

• Re: BOMs Phillip Hallam-Baker
• Re: [Json] BOMs Tatu Saloranta
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell
• Re: es-discuss Digest, Vol 81, Issue 82 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) John Cowan
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Julian Reschke
• Re: BOMs John Cowan
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell
• Re: [Json] BOMs (Was: Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Tim Bray
• Re: BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: BOMs Pete Cordell
• Re: BOMs Henry S. Thompson
• Re: BOMs Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: BOMs Martin J. Dürst
• Re: BOMs Henry S. Thompson
• BOMs (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell

Sunday, 17 November 2013

• Re: Encoding detection Pete Cordell
• Re: Encoding detection Pete Cordell

Thursday, 14 November 2013

• Encoding detection (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Pete Cordell

Friday, 15 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection Martin J. Dürst

Thursday, 14 November 2013

• Re: [Json] Encoding detection John Cowan
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection David Booth
• Re: [Json] Encoding detection John Cowan
• Re: Encoding detection Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft John Cowan
• Re: Encoding detection (Was: Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft) Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Martin J. Dürst
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Henry S. Thompson
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft John Cowan
• Article on Extensible Web Appelquist Daniel (UK)

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Joe Hildebrand

Thursday, 14 November 2013

• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Mark Davis ☕

Wednesday, 13 November 2013

• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft John Cowan
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Allen Wirfs-Brock
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Paul Hoffman
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Tony Hansen
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Carsten Bormann
• Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)

Tuesday, 12 November 2013

• Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Paul Hoffman
• Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Martin J. Dürst
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Martin J. Dürst
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Tim Bray
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Appelquist Daniel (UK)
• Re: JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON: encodings Anne van Kesteren
• JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft Anne van Kesteren
• Last Call: <draft-ietf-json-rfc4627bis-07.txt> (The JSON Data Interchange Format) to Proposed Standard Martin J. Dürst

Monday, 11 November 2013

• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Henri Sivonen
• Re: [apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Mark Nottingham
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Martin J. Dürst
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Robin Berjon
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Martin J. Dürst
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Tim Bray
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Anne van Kesteren
• Re: JSON feedback we could submit Martin J. Dürst
• JSON feedback we could submit Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 8 November 2013

• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henri Sivonen

Thursday, 7 November 2013

• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Julian Reschke
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Julian Reschke
• Perhap relevant -- Long Term Web Semantics Alex Russell
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

• Web Animations Feedback? Appelquist Daniel (UK)
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header John Kemp
• Re: [apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Marcos Caceres
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• RE: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Markus Lanthaler
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Henry S. Thompson
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Steve Klabnik
• Re: [apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Anne van Kesteren
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Martin J. Dürst

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Steve Klabnik

Wednesday, 6 November 2013

• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Unrestricted publishing in EME? Re: DRM, EDE, CDM, W3C and the TAG: Eric J. Bowman

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

• Re: [apps-discuss] Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Mark Nottingham
• Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Pat Hayes
• Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Jonathan A Rees
• Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Pat Hayes
• Minutes of TAG telcon 2013-10-17 Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Yves Lafon
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• RE: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Markus Lanthaler
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Martynas Jusevičius
• Re: X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Robin Berjon
• X-HTTP-Method-Override request header Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Fwd: CFC, app: URI scheme Charles McCathie Nevile

Monday, 4 November 2013

• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Mark Nottingham
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Julian Reschke
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Poul-Henning Kamp
• Request that the WG reconsider section 3.4: Content Negotiation Henry S. Thompson
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Noah Mendelsohn
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Anne van Kesteren

Friday, 1 November 2013

• Re: CFC, app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• Fwd: CFC, app: URI scheme Noah Mendelsohn
• 'reactive' or 'agent-driven' content negotiation query Henry S. Thompson

Last message date: Saturday, 30 November 2013 18:57:36 UTC