On 11/13/13, 3:43 PM, Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) wrote: > I would argue that we didn't have adequate representation from TC39 in > that discussion, and that their getting involved is as good a reason > as any to double-check that we've still got the same consensus. I know > that I for one decided to stop pushing for this when it looked like > there were a few more participants that wanted the status quo. I personally am on the side of making this change. I think it'd be an extreme shame if this incompatibility remained in the document. Tony HansenReceived on Wednesday, 13 November 2013 21:05:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:59 UTC