Re: CFC, app: URI scheme

On Mon, 4 Nov 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:
>> Only architectural question I had right now is if this should be layered on top of fetch [1]. I guess it depends if the class of application that the app:// uri scheme is used with is considered part of the web platform.
>>
>> [1] http://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/
>
> The web platform works on URLs that are universal. So e.g. http/https
> works due to DNS. A still-somewhat-theoretical p2p might work due to a

Not always, you can have XMLCatalogs that will intercept DTD fetch 
attempts and internally resolve them to a local file. (a local permanent 
cache for the specific application).

> universal content identifier. The application you are referring to
> however cannot be addressed by either of these. Rather, to get it you
> need to go through a "store" and download a "trusted" blob. That's
> very different from what the web platform stands for.
>
> Or in other words, you are designing a proprietary walled garden
> system around web technology. And that's fine, but the web platform
> should aspire to higher goals.

+1

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiƩu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 15:00:35 UTC