- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:15:12 +0000
- To: Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>
- Cc: "www-tag.w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com> wrote: > I used to be very mad about this, but have come to realize it's not that > big of a deal. Basically, all these frameworks _also_ support the actual > HTTP methods, so if you're building a non-browser client, you can use > the actual methods to take advantage of their semantics. With XMLHttpRequest you can use whatever method you please, apart from those which are a case-insensitive match for CONNECT, TRACE, or TRACK. > But, given that > all you need is GET and POST[2], and given that HTML still only allows > those two methods in a <form>, I don't think that it's a significant > problem. If you use <form>, how do you include this X-HTTP-Method-Override header? <form> does not allow for that. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 10:15:43 UTC