- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 17:33:05 -0500
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- Cc: "Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr)" <jhildebr@cisco.com>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Pete Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Henri Sivonen scripsit: > There is no legitimate reason to use UTF-32 for interchange. [snip] > As for UTF-16, there's no legitimate reason* for any new producer to > use it for interchange, This is all very well, but we are not at present in the business of banning previously permitted forms of JSON. If you have evidence that the specific use of these encodings harms JSON interchange, bring it forward. -- You are a child of the universe no less John Cowan than the trees and all other acyclic http://www.ccil.org/~cowan graphs; you have a right to be here. cowan@ccil.org --DeXiderata by Sean McGrath
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 22:33:30 UTC