Re: [Json] JSON: remove gap between Ecma-404 and IETF draft

On Nov 14, 2013, at 7:33 AM, John Cowan wrote:

> 
> Per contra, ECMA-404 refers only to text(ual content).  The BOM is
> meaningful when transforming byte sequences into code point sequences,
> but ECMA-404 deals in the latter only.  So it is the furthest thing
> from surprising that it makes no mention of BOMs, and has nothing to
> say about their use outside text.

Exactly ECMA-404 only defines a textual content format.  That was intentional.

Allen