- From: Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen@wirfs-brock.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:54:56 -0800
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Joe Hildebrand Hildebrand <jhildebr@cisco.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On Nov 14, 2013, at 7:33 AM, John Cowan wrote: > > Per contra, ECMA-404 refers only to text(ual content). The BOM is > meaningful when transforming byte sequences into code point sequences, > but ECMA-404 deals in the latter only. So it is the furthest thing > from surprising that it makes no mention of BOMs, and has nothing to > say about their use outside text. Exactly ECMA-404 only defines a textual content format. That was intentional. Allen
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2013 15:55:37 UTC