- From: Joe Hildebrand (jhildebr) <jhildebr@cisco.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:11:43 +0000
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@hsivonen.fi>
- CC: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, Pete Cordell <petejson@codalogic.com>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On 11/21/13 5:56 PM, "John Cowan" <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote: >We have therefore decided in the 4627bis effort not to say >that anything that was previously valid is now invalid. At least, that >is what I understand us to be doing. Specifically, the charter (http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/json/charter/) says: "Any changes that break compatibility with existing implementations of either RFC 4627 or the ECMAScript specification will need to have very strong justification and broad support." -- Joe Hildebrand
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2013 17:12:24 UTC