Re: Push back on the resource/representation introduction in HTTPbis?

Mi culpa. I clicked on [3] instead of [2]. Apologies to all (and especially to Henry.)

On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net> wrote:

> ....
> The only way I can make sense of what you've written, is as a repeat of your entirely sensible critique of the published specs, not on what Henry wrote.

Yes, exactly. Which is what I had read, by mistake, thinking it to be a proposed new draft. 

Pat (redfaced) Hayes

> That critique is part of the ancestry of this bit of text. I read Henry's text as trying to put some sense back into 2616bis, which has been wandering off into the dark side as you describe. As far as I can tell you and he agree.
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 home
40 South Alcaniz St.            (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile (preferred)
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Received on Tuesday, 5 November 2013 23:27:53 UTC