public-ldp-wg@w3.org from May 2013 by date

Friday, 31 May 2013

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• ISSUE-79 ldp:contains Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Looking Up Issues Using Linked Data URIs Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] John Arwe
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-63: Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering per Ashok's suggestion John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: section 4.1.5 John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] Roger Menday
• ldp-ISSUE-79 (ldp:contains): ldp:contains Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• ldp-ISSUE-78 (inferencing): inferencing levels [Linked Data Platform Spec] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Raúl García Castro
• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) Alexandre Bertails
• ISSUE-67 Wilde, Erik
• ISSUE-56/ISSUE-57 Wilde, Erik

Thursday, 30 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-75 (was ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example) Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• LDP agenda for June 3 Arnaud Le Hors
• Proposal to close ISSUE-63: Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering per Ashok's suggestion Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Steve Speicher
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Open issues at risk Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• ldp-ISSUE-77 (types of LDPR ): why MUST a LDPR declare it's type ... ? [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Raúl García Castro
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Raúl García Castro

Wednesday, 29 May 2013

• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Ashok Malhotra
• LDP F2F3 agenda Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Wilde, Erik
• Re: section 4.1.5 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Wilde, Erik
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Steve Speicher
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• ldp-ISSUE-76 (rename membershipXXX): rename the ldp:membershipXXX properties [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Wilde, Erik
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• ldp-ISSUE-75 (monotonicity): rdf:membershipProperty makes LDP PATCHing non-monotonic [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Alexandre Bertails
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Wilde, Erik
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Henry Story
• Re: Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example John Arwe
• section 4.1.5 Roger Menday
• container-first or entity-first ? Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story

Tuesday, 28 May 2013

• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership John Arwe
• Missing use case for supporting ldp:membershipPredicate/Subject Steve Speicher
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. John Arwe
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) John Arwe
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) Steve Speicher
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example John Arwe

Monday, 27 May 2013

• Binary resource and metadata example (ISSUE-15) Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Saturday, 25 May 2013

• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. Henry Story
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is Henry Story
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is Cody Burleson

Friday, 24 May 2013

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Proposal to close ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination, saying no. Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Proposal to close ISSUE-19: Adressing more error cases, as is Arnaud Le Hors
• Proposal to close ISSUE-17: changesets as a recommended PATCH format, as is Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate Steve Speicher

Thursday, 23 May 2013

• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-74 (conditional requests required): How does a client know if conditional requests are required [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Issue-64 (Non-member-properties HATEOAS Compliance) proposal to resolve John Arwe
• ldp-ISSUE-74 (conditional requests required): How does a client know if conditional requests are required [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• ldp-ISSUE-32 (affordances): new issues coming John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] David Wood
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution Steve Speicher
• membershipPredicates or not ? Roger Menday
• Specification edits for Issue-54 resolution Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Raúl García Castro
• Re: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Wednesday, 22 May 2013

• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Wilde, Erik
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Alexandre Bertails
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• LDP Minutes for May 13 and May 20 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• ldp-ISSUE-72 (membershipObject): The object of a membership triple isn't always the address of the created informational resource [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 21 May 2013

• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Roger Menday
• Re: Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Issue-71: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• membershipX: the first bug tracking example Henry Story
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate Ashok Malhotra
• ldp-ISSUE-71 (membershipX): No membershipSubject or membershipPredicate [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate Roger Menday
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate Ashok Malhotra
• An LDP example with and without membershipSubject predicate Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Roger Menday
• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? Steve Speicher
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Roger Menday
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: LD 5th Element ? Roger Menday
• Re: LD 5th Element ? John Arwe
• LD 5th Element ? Roger Menday

Monday, 20 May 2013

• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? David Wood
• Re: LDP F2F @ TPAC? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR Henry Story
• LDP F2F @ TPAC? Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: First draft of test cases Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT John Arwe
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT Raúl García Castro
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Kingsley Idehen

Sunday, 19 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Re: LDP Agenda for May 20 Sergio Fernández
• ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Ashok Malhotra
• LDP Agenda for May 20 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Need new Product(s) in Tracker Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Arnaud Le Hors

Saturday, 18 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Conclusion -- Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Wilde, Erik
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Wilde, Erik
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership - ISSUE-45 Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-70 (simple LDPCs): simple LDPCs [Linked Data Platform core] Henry Story
• ldp-ISSUE-70 (simple LDPCs): simple LDPCs [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR Henry Story

Friday, 17 May 2013

• Re: Recommendation for concise definition of LDPR Steve Speicher
• Re: Recommendation for specification edits Steve Speicher
• Need new Product(s) in Tracker John Arwe
• Re: Server behaviour on PUT Steve Speicher
• Re: Alternatives for using ETags Steve Speicher
• Re: Status codes for DELETE David Wood
• Re: HEAD vs OPTIONS Steve Speicher
• Re: Status codes for DELETE Steve Speicher
• Re: Status codes for DELETE Wilde, Erik
• Re: Issue-32 affordances John Arwe
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations John Arwe
• Re: Status codes for DELETE John Arwe
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations Raúl García Castro

Thursday, 16 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Define a minimal restriction on LDPR representations Raúl García Castro
• HEAD vs OPTIONS Raúl García Castro
• Status codes for DELETE Raúl García Castro
• Alternatives for using ETags Raúl García Castro
• Server behaviour on PUT Raúl García Castro
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec Steve Speicher
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Steve Speicher
• Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec Steve Speicher
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Richard Cyganiak
• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story

Tuesday, 14 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Steve Speicher
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Issue-32 affordances Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Monday, 13 May 2013

• Re: ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Kingsley Idehen
• ISSUE-58: the simple solution to inlined membership Henry Story
• Regrets for May 20 & 27 (Memorial Day, USA) Ted Thibodeau Jr
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 John Arwe

Saturday, 11 May 2013

• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Henry Story

Friday, 10 May 2013

• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Wilde, Erik
• LDP Agenda for May 13 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: First draft of test cases Arnaud Le Hors
• Proposal to close Issue-65: FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance Arnaud Le Hors
• First draft of test cases Raúl García Castro
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Wilde, Erik
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Wilde, Erik

Thursday, 9 May 2013

• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Wilde, Erik
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 Arnaud Le Hors
• Fwd: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Ashok Malhotra
• Fwd: Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Ashok Malhotra
• Re: Access Control Requirements Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Access Control Requirements Henry Story
• Re: Do we need transaction support in LDP? Arnaud Le Hors
• Do we need transaction support in LDP? Ashok Malhotra

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

• Re: membershipSubject clarification Henry Story
• Re: LDP minutes for May 6 John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe
• Re: membershipSubject clarification John Arwe
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe

Tuesday, 7 May 2013

• Re: membershipSubject clarification Roger Menday
• Re: How much REST should your web API get? Wilde, Erik

Monday, 6 May 2013

• Proposal to close ISSUE-69, as is Arnaud Le Hors
• LDP minutes for May 6 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: LDP Issues list maintenance Arnaud Le Hors
• ldp-ISSUE-69: Query syntaxes for accessing the first and subsequent pages Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• LDP Issues list maintenance Arnaud Le Hors
• ldp-ISSUE-68: Number of resources per page Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• ldp-ISSUE-67: Full container membership without pagination Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• ldp-ISSUE-66: Robust pagination [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• ldp-ISSUE-65 (FirstPage HATEOAS Compliance): FirstPage and Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State (HATEOAS) Compliance [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• ldp-ISSUE-64 (Non-member-properties HATEOAS Compliance): Non-member-properties and Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State (HATEOAS) Compliance [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• How much REST should your web API get? David Wood
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Steve Speicher
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Steve Speicher
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Pierre-Antoine Champin
• ldp-ISSUE-63 (Collation Support): Need to be able to specify collation with container ordering [Linked Data Platform core] Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe
• Re: membershipSubject clarification Sergio Fernández
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container John Arwe
• Re: membershipSubject clarification John Arwe

Friday, 3 May 2013

• Re: LDP agenda for May 6 Roger Menday
• Re: LDP agenda for May 6 Andy Seaborne
• LDP agenda for May 6 Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: membershipSubject clarification Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: membershipSubject clarification Roger Menday
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation Nandana Mihindukulasooriya
• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container Nandana Mihindukulasooriya

Thursday, 2 May 2013

• Re: PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container Pierre-Antoine Champin
• PUT,POST,PATCH of <> a ldp:Container Henry Story
• Re: membershipSubject clarification Henry Story

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] Roger Menday
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] John Arwe
• Re: On ISSUE-58: Property for asserting that complete description of members is included in LDPC representation John Arwe
• Re: ldp-ISSUE-62 (siblings): Creating Sibling Containers [Linked Data Platform core] Arnaud Le Hors

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 2013 21:27:55 UTC