- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:23:09 -0400
- To: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B4CB521C-6627-4111-8546-7C3F8036E5C9@3roundstones.com>
+1 from me. I think this should be a MUST.
Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood
On May 23, 2013, at 15:08, Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/73
>
> Raised by: Henry Story
> On product: Linked Data Platform core
>
> An LDPR MUST/SHOULD list all the resources that were created in it with a POST as rdf:member .
> That is doing a GET on the LDPC should return a list of members. These members are the HTTP resources that are GETable, PATCHable, POSTable, DELETEable .
>
> Advantages:
> - a client can easily find out all the members of an LDPC by GETing it and querying the returned representation with some query that is the equivalent of the SPARQL
> SELECT ?member WHERE { <> rdf:member ?member }
> - the client does not need reasoning to find out what the members are
> ( currently it seems to require some ldp:membershipProperty relation to find out what the member is )
> - LDPRs that are not LDPCs don't get lost after creation. An admin client can easily find out all the members. ( currently LDPRs may be listed on a remote resource for which one needs to know the LDPCs it came from and that it had a ldp:membershipSubject . The same issue would be true for an ldp:membershipObject . )
> - the LDPC is a good place to add metadata on the LDPR created such as title, update time, acl resources, ...
>
>
>
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 20:23:32 UTC