- From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 16:23:09 -0400
- To: Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B4CB521C-6627-4111-8546-7C3F8036E5C9@3roundstones.com>
+1 from me. I think this should be a MUST. Regards, Dave -- http://about.me/david_wood On May 23, 2013, at 15:08, Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > ldp-ISSUE-73 (rdf:member): LDPCs to list all their rdf:member [Linked Data Platform core] > > http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/73 > > Raised by: Henry Story > On product: Linked Data Platform core > > An LDPR MUST/SHOULD list all the resources that were created in it with a POST as rdf:member . > That is doing a GET on the LDPC should return a list of members. These members are the HTTP resources that are GETable, PATCHable, POSTable, DELETEable . > > Advantages: > - a client can easily find out all the members of an LDPC by GETing it and querying the returned representation with some query that is the equivalent of the SPARQL > SELECT ?member WHERE { <> rdf:member ?member } > - the client does not need reasoning to find out what the members are > ( currently it seems to require some ldp:membershipProperty relation to find out what the member is ) > - LDPRs that are not LDPCs don't get lost after creation. An admin client can easily find out all the members. ( currently LDPRs may be listed on a remote resource for which one needs to know the LDPCs it came from and that it had a ldp:membershipSubject . The same issue would be true for an ldp:membershipObject . ) > - the LDPC is a good place to add metadata on the LDPR created such as title, update time, acl resources, ... > > >
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2013 20:23:32 UTC