- From: Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 08:04:47 -0400
- To: Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <nmihindu@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOUJ7JrqXSCgx-PYTqzsJZp0NmA0jZm6pJPM1-H8zGH_aomBsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks, fixed it On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya < nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: > and a change in a link, > > In sections 4.4.7, 4.7.2, and 5.4.9, "enable simple creation and > modification" should now link to section 4.1.12 instead of 4.1.13. > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpr-4_1_13 --> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/ldpwg/raw-file/default/ldp.html#ldpr-4_1_12 > > Best Regards, > Nandana > > > > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Steve Speicher <sspeiche@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks for pointing this out, I replaced it with >> >> [[ >> For an LDPC, the same resource which is identified by its canonical URI, >> MAY be a member of more than one LDPC. >> ]] >> >> >> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya < >> nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The spec currently says >>> [[ >>> 5.2.2 For LDPC's of rdf:type of ldp:Container, the same resource which >>> is identified by its canonical URI, may be a member of more than one >>> ldp:Container. >>> ]] >>> >>> As per action-56, we now only have one type of container. So I think the >>> 'For LDPC's of rdf:type of ldp:Container' part of the sentence is now >>> redundant and can be eliminated. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Nandana >>> >>> [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/56 >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> - Steve >> > > -- - Steve
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2013 12:12:21 UTC