Re: An editorial suggestion for 5.2.2 in the spec

Thanks for pointing this out, I replaced it with

[[
For an LDPC, the same resource which is identified by its canonical URI,
MAY be a member of more than one LDPC.
]]


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
nmihindu@fi.upm.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The spec currently says
> [[
> 5.2.2 For LDPC's of rdf:type of ldp:Container, the same resource which is
> identified by its canonical URI, may be a member of more than one
> ldp:Container.
> ]]
>
> As per action-56, we now only have one type of container. So I think the
> 'For LDPC's of rdf:type of ldp:Container' part of the sentence is now
> redundant and can be eliminated.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nandana
>
> [1] - http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/actions/56
>



-- 
- Steve