Re: ISSUE-75 Non-montonic - was: ISSUE-71: second bug tracking example

> By-reference is totally different! That is exactly what I want to 
> not have confused with ldp:contains.

My gut reaction is: if a client listing a container's membership is 
limited to finding resources newly created by/through HTTP interactions 
with the container, then this spec applies to zero of my use cases.  It 
completely ceases to be an interesting spec in anything aside from a 
purely academic exercise, and I don't get paid for those (oh that it were 
so!  :-)

It cannot even handle a simple query result from a db query.

Now maybe there is something in all changes you've proposed that I've 
missed, if so by all means point it out.

I have no problem with the notion that a container exposes that smaller 
member list, optionally. 
But limiting it to that, not AT ALL interested/ing.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario

Received on Friday, 31 May 2013 20:31:02 UTC